Our firm is fully operational and working remotely in the midst of the Coronavirus impacting New Jersey. Please feel free to call us or contact us online for a free consultation with one of our lawyers.

New Jersey Supreme Court Clarifies Searches of Motor Vehicles During Traffic Stops

New Jersey Illegal Car Search LawyerIn a recent case, the New Jersey Supreme Court further delineated the circumstances under which officers can use the “protective sweep doctrine” as an exception to the warrant requirement when seeking to search a motor vehicle during a traffic stop.

The case that gave rise to this precedential decision was State v. Robinson, which involved the driver of a vehicle pulled over in a suspected drug zone. A police officer conducted a traffic stop when he observed Robinson allegedly driving unsafely with three passengers in his car. After pulling him over, the officer requested Robinson’s license and registration, and was reportedly struck by his confusing answers when identifying himself. Apparently, Robinson told the officer that his license was currently suspended, but provided registration and proof of insurance.

Upon further investigation, the officer discovered that Robinson and one of his passengers had outstanding warrants for their arrests and were known to carry weapons. The  officer then requested backup, and four officers arrived on the scene shortly thereafter. The occupants of the vehicle were asked to exit the vehicle, while Robinson and one other passenger were arrested. None of the car’s occupants resisted arrest or were found with weapons on their persons. The car was then searched for weapons, while one of the passengers left her purse on the front passenger seat. When the officer lifted the purse to search the seat, he allegedly felt a gun inside.

After removing the gun from the purse, the officers arrested the other two occupants of the vehicle and all four were charged with unlawful possession of a handgun. As the case proceeded, the defense filed a motion to suppress the firearm, arguing that it should be excluded from evidence because it was the product of an illegal search. The original motion was denied by the trial court, but taken up on appeal, the Appellate Division panel determined that the search was, in fact, unconstitutional. The State justified the search as falling within the realm of the protective sweep exception to the warrant requirement. Ultimately, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate decision, stating in its opinion that the protective sweep exception did not apply in this case.

Illegal Searches in New Jersey and Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement

In general, law enforcement officials cannot search a vehicle or any other personal property or premises without first obtaining a search warrant, unless the search satisfies one of the exceptions to the warrant requirement. The “protective sweep doctrine” is one such exception, first articulated in the case Terry v. State of Ohio. In Terry v. Ohio, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a law enforcement officer can quickly search a suspect without executing an arrest if the officer has a reasonable suspicion, supported by “specific and articulable facts,” that the suspect may be armed and presently dangerous. A subsequent case, Maryland v. Buie, extended the protective sweep doctrine to include searches of rooms in private dwellings. Thus, when officers are making an arrest in a private residence, they can search adjacent rooms if they have reasonable belief, based on specific and articulable facts, that the rooms may contain another person who poses an immediate danger.

Essentially, the protective sweep doctrine allows officers to conduct a quick search if said search is a reasonable action to protect their safety, based on specific and articulable facts. In the recent case of State v. Robinson, the State argued that the officer had a valid exception to the warrant requirement, under the protective sweep doctrine, to search the vehicle and the items contained therein. However, the New Jersey Supreme Court found that the protective sweep exception did not apply in this case because all of the car’s occupants had been removed from the vehicle and none of them had attempted to retrieve the handgun from the purse. In other words, the five officers on the scene may have suspected that a weapon was present, but they had sufficiently secured themselves from any of the vehicle’s occupants accessing the weapon.

If any of the car’s occupants could have immediately accessed the vehicle and the weapon inside, then the protective sweep may have been justified, and the exception to the warrant requirement, valid. The fundamental question is: did the officer lawfully search the car and remove the gun without a warrant to protect himself and the other officers at the scene? The answer, according to the New Jersey Supreme Court, is no.

Testimonials

  • No promises, just a Pro!

  • Excellent Lawyer... Helped me in every step off my Case..

  • Great work

  • Best lawyer!!

  • FRO removal success!!

  • Easy to work with, straightforward

  • Kept my license

  • Father of client

  • Excellent Attorney , Charges Dismissed as promised

  • Helped every step of the way

  • Avoid mandatory jail time on shoplifting charges

  • GREAT – HONEST- ATTORNEY -AND – VERY GOOD

  • Help

  • Did the job he was hired to do

  • Great lawyer

  • Simple assault charge was dropped

  • Top Notch Representation

  • Well worth it.

  • DUI Case Dismissed

  • 2 felony charges dismissed

  • Cameron bury

  • great attorney

  • Hands Down Professional and delivers results!!!

  • DUI case dismissed

  • 125 stars out of 10!!

  • Excellent at getting best outcome

  • Excellent Attorney

  • TRO Dismissal

  • Efficient Excellent attorney.

  • Excellent attorney

  • Travis successfully defended me in an unprecedented Final Restraining Order Trial with ease

  • Kick Ass Attorney!

  • Efficient and professional attorney

  • Great Lawyer And Great Results

  • Top Notch DUI Attorney

  • Client Domestic Violence

  • Restraining Order

  • A real pro in a time of need - DWI Dismissed.

  • The most experienced, patient and affordable attorney

  • Travis Tormey successfully had a False TRO against me dismissed.

  • Underaged Drinking

  • Underaged Drinking

  • DUI Dismissed

  • Saved me from a DUI. HIGHLY recommended

  • Restraining Order

  • Case dismissed with Data Driven Facts

  • Respectful. Attentive. Professional.

  • Trespassing and Under the Influence Disorderly Persons charges

  • If you are reading this- You have reached the right place! Undoubtedly, the BEST Law Firm in New Jersey!

  • Amazing attorney with a heart of gold

  • Exceeded my expectations, Highly Professional Attorney

  • Responsive and knowledgeable.

  • The Tormey law firm was very kind and professional

  • Expungement

  • Travis Tormey is a True Professional Who Kept Me Out of Jail

  • Saved me a whole ton of problems

  • Travis Tormey Review

  • A nightmare case, with a happy ending.

  • Elite NJ Marijuana Attorney! 5 Stars!!

  • An Excellent lawyer!

  • Great lawyer for DUI

  • I highly endorse Travis Tormey.

  • Travis Tormey Law Firm

  • Travis is a Lifesaver

  • Travis J. Tormey - Evaluation

  • Great Lawyer. Got me off exactly what I wanted

  • Consummate Professional!

  • Great Criminal Defense Lawyer

  • Good Service

  • Exceptional Lawyer

  • Exceptional Lawyer

  • Hired to defend me for aggravated assault

  • Hired to defend me in a restraning order

  • Excellent attorney, highly recommend his talents

  • DWI Counsel

  • I highly recommend Mr. Tormey

  • Great attorney

  • Travis Tormey, Esq. - Great Results!

  • Travis Tormey - Excellent Attorney-Kind and Trustworthy

  • Excellent Attorney-Trustworthy and Kind

  • An Outstanding lawyer!!! That will represent you in the correct way!

  • Excellent Attorney! You will not be dissapointed....

  • Travis Tormey Gets Results!

  • tormey

  • Success!!

  • Travis Tormey Review

  • Only Lawyer I Recommend

  • Very Grateful

  • Attorney review of Travis Tormey

  • Excellent

Experience You Can Trust

With unmatched knowledge and experience in the practice of law, the seasoned attorneys at The Tormey Law Firm are committed to serving their clients and tenaciously confronting the allegations against them.

We will examine every facet of your case in order to defend your constitutional rights and reputation. With a dedicated legal advocate to assist you, our attorneys will ensure that you are never forced to navigate the complex legal process on your own.

Learn More About How to Fight Your Charges

If you've been charged with a criminal offense, disorderly persons offense, or traffic / DWI violation, you have the right to an attorney who will defend you against your charges and fight for your best interests. To learn more about how your attorney can fight to have your charges dismissed or reduced, click a link below to see our video library of legal defenses and strategies.

The Tormey Law Firm

Areas we serve

Bergen County, Essex County, Morris County, Passaic County, Hudson County, Middlesex County, Somerset County including Morristown, Denville, Dover, Mount Olive, Parsippany, Hackensack, East Rutherford, Elmwood Park, Englewood, Fort Lee, Garfield, Lodi, Lyndhurst, Mahwah, Palisades Park, Paramus, Ridgefield Park, Saddle Brook, Teaneck, Clifton, and Wayne.

  • Hackensack Office

    254 State Street Hackensack, NJ 07601

    (201) 556-1570

    view larger map

  • Morristown Office

    55 Madison Avenue Suite 400, Morristown, NJ 07960

    (908) 336-5008

    view larger map